>“concept map,” you may find some more examples of non-hierarchical mindīut after years of trying different concept mappers, nothing seems to match the speed and convenience of pen and paper as “the best for ‘thinking on paper’. Hit return twice and you have a new note awaiting your typing.Īt 10:26 you search the forum for “concept mapping”, “concept mapper” and “concept map,” you may find some more examples of non-hierarchical mind mapping software.ĭr Andus you search the forum for “concept mapping”, “concept mapper” and Independence clusters in a web hierarchy, goals are linked according to content or direction. Ideas can be sorted by main thoughts or groups. Also with Tinderbox you can bang out the notes in rapid fire, if you need to. With Scapple, you can manipulate words, equations, and images all into one pixel-clear mind map. Arrange them in a timeline and by priority and by cost and by whatever. It is more expensive, so if all you want is what Scapple does, stick with Scapple.Īs for the Tinderbox-Scapple comparison, here is another benefit of Tinderbox (if it is important to you): You can make clones (aliases) of your notes, so you can simultaneously view them different ways. But it does that Scapple-like work pretty well. Of course, like Tinderbox, Curio is much more than a concept mapping app. Magnetic background shapes are nice.Īnother white board app that compares to Scapple is Curio. For brainstorming creative writing, it’s quick and easy. Link up 1,000 different combinations of 10 nodes each and the spiderweb of lines may become difficult to navigate. A conventional mind map will have a central node that may be of no use beyond tying like nodes together.īut, like most mind map utilities, put 3,000 nodes into it and clutter may become a problem. Scapple is very nice for the reason it’s simplistic.

That it *doesn’t* clutter its feature set is a good thing. Scapple has a specific, narrow purpose, and does it well. Likewise, you can compare which product has superior general user satisfaction rating: 100 (Mindomo) and 95 (Scapple) to find out which solution is the better choice for your company.

I don’t think Literature and Latte designed Scapple to compete with the heavier tools mentioned here. As an illustration, you can match Mindomo and Scapple for their tools and overall scores, in this case, 8.8 and 8.4, respectively. When all I want to do is what a tool like Scapple offers, then bloating the feature set diminishes the value. > But, the complexity of the applications seems to put some kind of mental barrier to use them for small things: for fast thinking. Is Scapple the best for 'thinking on paper'

Scapple mindmap comparison